{"id":11728,"date":"2017-03-13T08:03:24","date_gmt":"2017-03-13T08:03:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revoscience.com\/en\/?p=11728"},"modified":"2017-03-13T08:03:24","modified_gmt":"2017-03-13T08:03:24","slug":"global-agreements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/global-agreements\/","title":{"rendered":"Global agreements"},"content":{"rendered":"

In new book, MIT linguist expands the horizons of language analysis<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
MIT professor Shigeru Miyagawa\u2019s new book \u2014 \u201cAgreement Beyond Phi,\u201d out today from the MIT Press \u2014 explores the unexpected structural similarities among languages.
Photo: Melanie Gonick\/MIT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. —\u00a0Many linguistics scholars regard the world’s languages as being fundamentally similar. Yes, the characters, words, and rules vary. But underneath it all, enough similar structures exist to form what MIT scholars call universal grammar, a capacity for language that all humans share.<\/span><\/p>\n

To see how linguists find similarities that can elude the rest of us, consider a language operation called “allocutive agreement.” This is a variation of standard subject-verb agreement. Normally, a verb ending simply agrees with the subject of a sentence, so that in English we say, \u201cYou go,\u201d but also, \u201cShe goes.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Allocutive agreement throws a twist into this procedure: Even a third-person verb ending, such as \u201cshe goes,\u201d changes depending on the social status of the person being spoken to. This happens in Basque, for one. It also occurs in Japanese, says MIT linguist Shigeru Miyagawa, even though Japanese has long been thought not to deploy agreement at all. But in fact, Miyagawa asserts, the same principles of formality appear in Japanese, if you know where to look.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt goes a long way toward the idea that there’s agreement in every language,\u201d says Miyagawa, a professor of linguistics and the Kochi-Manjiro Professor of Japanese Language and Culture at MIT. \u201cIn Japanese this politeness system has exactly the same distribution as the Basque allocutive system.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Now Miyagawa has published a book \u2014 \u201cAgreement Beyond Phi,\u201d out today from the MIT Press \u2014 that explores some of these unexpected structural similarities among languages. The book has a second aim, as well: Miyagawa would like to orient the search for universal linguistic principles around a greater diversity of languages. (The title, incidentally, refers to agreement systems that are not found in Indo-European languages.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Because English is the native language of so many great linguists, he observes, there is a tendency to regard it as a template for other languages. But drawing more heavily on additional languages, Miyagawa thinks, could lead to new insights about the specific contents of our universal language capacity; he cites the work of MIT linguist Norvin Richards as an example of this kind of work.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cGiven the prominence of Indo-European languages, especially English, in linguistic theory, one sometimes gets the impression that if something happens in English it\u2019s due to universal grammar, but if something happens in Japanese, it\u2019s because it\u2019s Japanese,\u201d Miyagawa says.<\/span><\/p>\n

Not mere formalities<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

To see why allocutive agreement seems like such a compelling example to Miyagawa, take a very brief look at how it works.<\/span><\/p>\n

The best-known examples of addressing people formally come from Indo-European languages such as French, in which second-person subject-verb agreement changes in a simple way, depending on the social status of the person being addressed. Consider the phrase, \u201cYou speak.\u201d To a peer or friend, you would use the informal version, \u201cTu parles.\u201d But to a teacher or an older stranger you would likely use the more formal agreement, \u201cVous parlez.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

What happens in Basque and Japanese is a bit more complicated, however, since both informal and formal modes of address are employed even when speaking about other people. For instance, in Basque, consider a phrase Miyagawa dissects in the book, \u201cPeter worked.\u201d To a male friend, you would say, \u201cPeter lan egin dik.\u201d But to someone with higher social status, you would say, \u201cPeter lan egin dizu.\u201d The verb ending \u2014 the verb is last word in this sentence \u2014 changes even though it remains in the third person.<\/span><\/p>\n

And while Japanese grammar differs in many ways from Basque grammar, Miyagawa contends in the new book that Japanese \u201cpoliteness marking\u201d follows the same rules. The sentence \u201cTaro said that Hanako will come,\u201d for example, includes the politeness marking \u201cmas\u201d when being spoken in a formal setting. In Japanese, transliterated in English characters, this becomes: \u201cTaroo-wa hanako-ga ki-mas-u to itta.\u201d But for the same sentence, when spoken to a peer, the \u201cmas\u201d disappears.<\/span><\/p>\n

This kind of agreement, Miyagawa notes, is something he proposed in a 2010 book \u2014 titled, \u201cWhy Agree? Why Move?\u201d \u2014 but did not observe until about 2012.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI found in Basque the prediction I made in 2010 but couldn\u2019t substantiate then,\u201d Miyagawa says. \u201cIt\u2019s exactly the same agreement system.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Strikingly, Basque and Japanese seem to have very different origins. And Basque \u2014 although spoken in the Basque region that lies in between France and Spain \u2014 is not an Indo-European language. Indeed, linguists are not certain how to account for the origins of Basque. The presence of allocative agreement in both tongues, then, suggests a deep and unexpected universality among the kinds of linguistic rules that can occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unpredictable<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Miyagawa acknowledges he cannot predict precisely how his colleagues in linguistics will react to the book\u2019s agenda, but says he has gotten a positive reception when presenting its concepts at conferences.<\/span><\/p>\n

Miyagawa himself stresses that the point of the research is not to upend the conceptual foundations of universal grammar \u2014 as codified by MIT linguist Noam Chomsky and many others \u2014 but to expand the range of comparisons available to linguists. Beyond English, Japanese, and Basque, the book also draws on similarities found in Dinka (spoken in Sudan) and Jingpo (spoken in China and Burma), among other languages.<\/span><\/p>\n

The book, he says, \u201cis heavily influenced by the insights of the previous work, [and is] standing on the shoulders of some of the great minds, of Chomsky and many others.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

But when linguists look at more and more languages, Miyagawa adds, \u201cYou start to discover things you never noticed before.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In new book, MIT linguist expands the horizons of language analysis CAMBRIDGE, Mass. —\u00a0Many linguistics scholars regard the world’s languages as being fundamentally similar. Yes, the characters, words, and rules vary. But underneath it all, enough similar structures exist to form what MIT scholars call universal grammar, a capacity for language that all humans share. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":11729,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research","category-social-science"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0-300x200.jpg",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"ultp_layout_landscape_large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"ultp_layout_landscape":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"ultp_layout_portrait":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",600,400,false],"ultp_layout_square":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",600,400,false],"newspaper-x-single-post":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"newspaper-x-recent-post-big":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",540,360,false],"newspaper-x-recent-post-list-image":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",95,63,false],"web-stories-poster-portrait":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",639,426,false],"web-stories-publisher-logo":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",96,64,false],"web-stories-thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/MIT-Beyond-Phi_0.jpg",150,100,false]},"author_info":{"info":["Amrita Tuladhar"]},"category_info":"Research<\/a> Social Science<\/a>","tag_info":"Social Science","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11728\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}