{"id":37136,"date":"2026-04-21T06:48:06","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T01:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/?p=37136"},"modified":"2026-04-21T06:48:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T01:03:10","slug":"muon-g-2-experiment-pioneers-win-breakthrough-prize-in-fundamental-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/muon-g-2-experiment-pioneers-win-breakthrough-prize-in-fundamental-physics\/","title":{"rendered":"Muon g-2 Experiment Pioneers Win Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

GENEVA \u2014 The Muon g-2 Collaborations at CERN \u2014 the European Organization for Nuclear Research \u2014 and two U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratories \u2014 Brookhaven National Laboratory and Fermi\u00a0National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) \u2014 are the recipients of this year\u2019s\u00a0Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over a period of more than 60 years, experiments at these three renowned research institutions pursued a quest to measure, as precisely as possible, the subtle wobble of the muon \u2014 a tiny subatomic particle that offered an opportunity to test physicists\u2019 fundamental understanding of particles and forces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Breakthrough Prize Foundation citation recognizes the awardees\u2019 \u201cmulti-decade, groundbreaking contributions to the measurement of the muon\u2019s anomalous magnetic moment, pushing the boundaries of experimental precision and igniting a new era in the quest for physics beyond the Standard Model.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The prizewinners are the living co-authors of the publications that reported the results from the measurement campaigns at CERN, Brookhaven, and Fermilab. The $3 million prize will be split among all living co-authors at all three institutions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two pairs of scientists representing the experiments at Brookhaven and Fermilab will accept the prize on behalf of the group at a gala celebration at the Barker Hangar<\/a> in Santa Monica, California, on Saturday, April 18, 2026. They are: William M. Morse of Brookhaven Lab and Bradley Lee Roberts of Boston University, who helped lead the \u201cmuon g-2\u201d experiment<\/a> at Brookhaven from construction in 1990 to the publication of final results in 2004; and Chris Polly of Fermilab and David Hertzog of the University of Washington, who helped lead a follow-up \u201cMuon g-2\u201d<\/a> experiment at Fermilab from 2013 through publication of final results in 2025. The award also recognizes an earlier series of \u201cg-2\u201d<\/a> experiments conducted at CERN from 1959 to 1979.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Popularly known as the \u201cOscars\u00ae of Science,\u201d the Breakthrough Prizes were created in 2012 by a group of Silicon Valley innovators to recognize the world\u2019s top scientists working in the fundamental sciences \u2014 the disciplines that ask the biggest questions and find the deepest explanations. Additional prizes were awarded in a variety of categories, including the Life Sciences and Mathematics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background: mystery of the muon<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The muon has been a bit of an enigma since its discovery in 1936. It shares certain characteristics with electrons, including its negative charge and a form of internal magnetism, dubbed \u201cg,\u201d but is 200 times heavier. Was it just a heavy cousin of the electron, or something else? Measuring its magnetism might point to clues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Early calculations suggested the value of g should be 2 for both electrons and muons. But experiments in the 1940s revealed that electrons have a tiny bit of extra magnetism. Physicists expressed this \u201canomalous magnetic moment\u201d as \u201cg-2,\u201d to represent the amount that g differs from the calculated value of 2. Over time, physicists realized that the electron\u2019s tiny deviation from 2 is caused by interactions with a sea of \u201cvirtual particles\u201d popping in and out of existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By measuring the g-factor of muons, physicists could see if these interactions were affecting muons, too. If they observed more deviation than expected, that discrepancy might point to a hole in their understanding of the virtual particles causing the magnetic disturbance \u2014 and possibly the existence of yet-to-be-discovered particles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Method: comparing measurements with predictions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The experiments at all three institutions recognized by this prize were driven by this same basic principle: Measure the muon g-2 value with the highest precision possible and compare those measurements with the best predictions available at the time. They all used a similar experimental setup: sending a beam of muons into a magnetic ring and using sensitive detectors to measure the degree to which these tiny spinning particles began to wobble, or \u201cprecess,\u201d away from perfect alignment as they sailed around the ring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Results: from CERN, Brookhaven<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three separate experiments at CERN from 1959 to 1979, each with increasing precision, measured the muon\u2019s g-factor as slightly higher than two, exactly as predicted by the theory-based calculations. This confirmed the predictions and firmly established the muon\u2019s identity as a heavy cousin of the electron. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Improved experimental techniques and expanded knowledge of particles and forces motivated new muon g-2 experiments. That\u2019s when Bill Morse and Lee Roberts entered the scene. Together with Vernon Hughes of Yale University (deceased in 2003), they built and led the \u201cE821 g-2\u201d experiment at Brookhaven Lab.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the first Brookhaven muon g-2 results were published in 2001<\/a>, it set off a worldwide spark of excitement. The findings revealed a tantalizingly larger-than-predicted anomaly, but not enough of a difference between experiment and theory to claim a discovery. Results published in 2002<\/a> improved the precision of Brookhaven\u2019s measurement. The final result, published in 2004<\/a>, deviated further from the prediction, but was still just a hint that muons might be affected by something unknown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The continuing mystery launched an effort among physicists to improve the precision of both the theoretical predictions and the experimental measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fermilab: moving muons to Illinois<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2013, under the guidance of Morse, Roberts, David Hertzog, and Chris Polly \u2014 working with a large international team \u2014 Brookhaven Lab\u2019s g-2 muon storage magnet embarked on an epic land-and-sea journey<\/a> from Long Island, New York, to Fermilab outside of Chicago. There it was set up to repeat the experiment using Fermilab\u2019s higher-intensity muon beam and new state-of-the-art technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In parallel, an international collaboration of theorists formed the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative<\/a> to improve the theoretical calculation. In 2020, the Theory Initiative published<\/a> an updated, more precise muon g-2 prediction based on a technique that uses input data from other experiments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The discrepancy between experiment and the prediction from that technique continued to grow in 2021 when Fermilab announced its first experimental result<\/a>, confirming the Brookhaven result with a slightly improved precision. At the same time, a new theoretical prediction<\/a> came out based on a new technique that heavily relies on computational power. This new predicted value was almost in agreement with the experimental measurement, suddenly narrowing the discrepancy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The theory: a new discrepancy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recently, the Theory Initiative published<\/a> a new prediction combining the results of several groups that used the new computational technique. This prediction agrees with the experimental measurement, dampening the possibility that muons will point to \u201cnew physics.\u201d However, theorists will continue to work to understand this new discrepancy \u2014 not between experimental measurements and predictions but between the data-driven and computational approaches for making the predictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is there still a possibility that the muon\u2019s magnetic moment could be a harbinger of new physics? The mystery continues. But either way, the Breakthrough Prize is a testament to the ever-increasing precision of these experiments and the persistence of the researchers in their quest to pursue an answer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Muon g-2 Collaborations at CERN \u2014 the European Organization for Nuclear Research \u2014 and two U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratories \u2014 Brookhaven National Laboratory and Fermi\u00a0National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) \u2014 are the recipients of this year\u2019s\u00a0Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":37137,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[314,121],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-society","category-physics"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-scaled.webp",2560,1920,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-200x200.webp",200,200,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-675x506.webp",675,506,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-768x576.webp",750,563,true],"large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-1100x825.webp",750,563,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-1536x1152.webp",1536,1152,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-2048x1536.webp",2048,1536,true],"ultp_layout_landscape_large":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-1200x800.webp",1200,800,true],"ultp_layout_landscape":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-870x570.webp",870,570,true],"ultp_layout_portrait":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-600x900.webp",600,900,true],"ultp_layout_square":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-600x600.webp",600,600,true],"newspaper-x-single-post":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-760x490.webp",760,490,true],"newspaper-x-recent-post-big":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-550x360.webp",550,360,true],"newspaper-x-recent-post-list-image":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-95x65.webp",95,65,true],"web-stories-poster-portrait":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-640x853.webp",640,853,true],"web-stories-publisher-logo":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-96x96.webp",96,96,true],"web-stories-thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/muon-g-2-experiment-group-1-150x112.webp",150,112,true]},"author_info":{"info":["RevoScience"]},"category_info":"Society<\/a> Physics<\/a>","tag_info":"Physics","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37136"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37138,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37136\/revisions\/37138"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revoscience.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}